DCML digest, Vol 1 #559 - 15 msgs
frspreaf at tin.it
Sat Jun 9 19:38:58 CEST 2001
From: <JALustig at aol.com>
> By the way, I can't say that I agree with the idea that the Barks paintings
> are of no or little importance. Personally, I enjoy most of them. They are
> much more impressive if you see the originals rather than the reproductions.
I'll sneak in here to say what I think about this matter. I'm no "fine art"
expert, I think that Barks' oils are pretty nice, and that's enough for me.
Had I the money (lots and lots) and had to choose between a Picasso and a
Barks (repeat: LOTS. So much money that I wouldn't be interested in resell)
I'd certainly choose a Barks... but for what's behind the oil itself, that is
the story that inspired it.
More information about the DCML