<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">In a message dated 3/8/2003 3:00:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, lpj@forfatter.dk writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Who knows, maybe Gemstone still has time to use Fecchi's cover, rather<BR>
than Van Horn's?! The (good) Van Horn cover could instead be used for<BR>
Comics &Stories, where it would fit right in.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Makes sense to me. Personally, I think that William Van Horn is the best artist suited for WDC&S since Barks himself. He seems to have a more "gag"-like approach to drawing the Ducks, unlike Barks, who of course seems to have more of an "adventure"-like approach to them.<BR>
<BR>
I hope Gemstone realizes this over time, if they haven't already.<BR>
-- <BR>
Dane Martin</FONT></HTML>