<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; ">I like to look for and appreciate the rendering of light. It's because of that that I liked and still like TRON. The light quality was exactly one of the features that drew me to the film, flaws and all. It was about being in a computer, with those the crude graphics of the time. The light was the major factor that helped sell that. I'd like to see a modern revisiting of the premise, with modern rendering (and modern rendering glitches).<DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>(TRON was more of a Disney label than a Disney production, for what that's worth. Somewhere I've read or heard that it pulled the studio out of a charisma slump.) </DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>\bob peterson</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"><DIV><BR><DIV><DIV>On Sep 17, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Dave Rawson wrote:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><FONT face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">This was all in profound contrast to Tron, which had a kind of cheesy rotoscoping cum 8-bit processing quality to it, no matter that it is considered a cult-favorite today.</FONT></DIV> <BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>