<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
Kriton:<br><div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 10.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="5" style="font: 16.0px Helvetica">However unattainable those standards may have been, the rewriters knew that's what they were shooting for and in fact wanted to shoot for, constrained only by the parameters of stories' visuals.</font></p> </blockquote><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 16.0px Helvetica; min-height: 17.0px"><br></p> <p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="5" style="font: 16.0px Helvetica">Does this mean that they produced scripts that matched the visuals, but did not necessarily have anything to do with the original story, i.e., something like what Woody Allen did in "What's Up Tiger Lily?"</font></p> </blockquote></div><br><div>This did happen on occasion. I remember one DuckTales story I rewrote that I just had to refurbish. The art was such that I was able to recast the "villain" of the piece and change his motivation, which amounted to giving him a motivation in the first place. The original verbiage made the character out as nothing more than an inexplicable idiot.</div><div><br></div><div>Gary</div></body></html>