<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
<BR> Daniel, you must be right about Disney not being the copyright holders of the generation. They have not yet seen the Donaldist organizasions, like Danish Donaldist Society...<BR><BR>I hope they never do... It is horrible to think about, what would happen to Donaldists around Denmark, and the whole world...<BR><BR><BR><BR>
<DIV>
<DIV id=SkyDrivePlaceholder></DIV>From: dcml-request@nafsk.se<BR>Subject: DCML Digest, Vol 104, Issue 9<BR>To: dcml@nafsk.se<BR>Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:13:01 +0100<BR><BR><PRE>Send DCML mailing list submissions to<BR> dcml@nafsk.se<BR> <BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR> <A href="http://nafsk.se/mailman/listinfo/dcml" target=_blank>http://nafsk.se/mailman/listinfo/dcml</A><BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR> dcml-request@nafsk.se<BR> <BR>You can reach the person managing the list at<BR> dcml-owner@nafsk.se<BR> <BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of DCML digest..."<BR></PRE><BR><BR>--Videresendt meddelelse med vedhæftet fil--<BR>From: dve@kabelfoon.nl<BR>To: dcml@nafsk.se<BR>Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:44:23 +0100<BR>Subject: Re: Hobby Use<BR><BR><PRE>GARY LEACH, 23-01-2012:<BR> <BR>> Disney is hardly the only entity, corporate or personal,<BR>> to take that position on intellectual property, but they,<BR>> along with Apple, seem to be the standard bearers for<BR>> "When In Doubt, Use Your Legal Clout". It's pretty much<BR>> the way of the business world in these times.<BR> <BR>I think that in practice, Disney is rather tolerant towards hobby use. The<BR>internet is full of Disney images copied or created by amateurs. And I'm<BR>grateful that Disney apparently doesn't mind about that. (Maybe they see it<BR>as free advertising?)<BR>Only when people make huge, high resolution galleries, Disney seems to<BR>bother. And which company wouldn't.<BR> <BR>Could Hergé (Tintin) be a better example of copyright holders being strong<BR>on people using their images? I have from hearsay, that they really take<BR>action when people use even a small portion of their property. But then<BR>again, this is hearsay.<BR> <BR>Best wishes,<BR>Daniël<BR> <BR> <BR></PRE><BR><BR>--Videresendt meddelelse med vedhæftet fil--<BR>From: spe@inducks.org<BR>To: dve@kabelfoon.nl; dcml@nafsk.se<BR>Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:10:26 +0100<BR>Subject: Re: Hobby Use<BR><BR><PRE>"D.M. van Eijmeren" <dve@kabelfoon.nl> skrev:<BR>>Could Hergé (Tintin) be a better example of copyright holders being<BR>>strong<BR>>on people using their images? I have from hearsay, that they really<BR>>take<BR>>action when people use even a small portion of their property. But then<BR>>again, this is hearsay.<BR> <BR>A good example is the Swedish fan club Generation Tintin which was forced to change its name into Generation T after pressure from Hergé/Moulinsart a few years ago.<BR> <BR>Stefan<BR> <BR> <BR></PRE></DIV> </div></body>
</html>