Disney Magazine

[Rob Klein]

Thank you Harry, for the Disney World Paris reference. Of course, I was 
remembering the DisneyLand magazine of the 1970s and FORGETTING when 
Disneyworld Paris was opened.  Of course, I've never had anything to do with 
the Disney Parks - so it was easy for me to not even remember within 20 years 
of when it started.  OR, is it because I'm getting close to 60 years old, and 
not getting enough oxygen to my brain. I eat a lot of fish to feed my gray 
matter.  But, I guess my collecting all that MERCURY is worse for me than 
the "natural" benefit of the fish's "brain food".  I'd better switch to 
ginkobaloba!!!  Many of the European publishers published that Disney 
children's magazine, to get to the younger children. Anyone know if there also 
one published in Britain and USA?

YES, SIGVALD..... I WAS making a joke. It was to prove the point that others 
were trying to make: That one can prove just about ANYTHING by using parts 
of the thousands of stories by the thousands of creators with differing views 
on the Disney universes.  That's very much like our various liberal and 
conservative politicians all finding some data that "prove" whatever point they 
want to make, isn't it????

Like several others on our list have already posted, I observed, perused and 
read page 12 of the Distelfink story.  I printed a copy from the internet, and 
placed the page 12 copy (small area by small area, under a microscope.  I have 
yet to find anything that even SUGGESTS, (let alone IMPLIES) that The unseen 
birth inside the bedroom was a "live birth". I'm not totally illiterate in 
Danish or Norwegian, as I used to live in Danmark. The wording stated something 
to the effect of "I'm ready" or "it's ready"-or "it's ready to happen".  I 
can't remember now - but what I DO remember was it DIDN'T SAY "anything about 
her "water breaking".  It seems to me that the EGG was ready to come out, or 
starting to come out (if you believe in Rota's and Strobl's precedents-OR, you 
COULD think of it as a live birth (if you choose to believe that way).  BUT, 
there is no proof, evidence or indication that there was a live birth occurring 
(as you claim, Sigvald. I apologize to all of you dcmlers who don't want to 
hear the same comments made over and over again (but when it is said ENOUGH 
times, it becomes anecdotal data (that can be used as DATA of its own (almost 
like a non-scientific poll!)).

Say! Maybe I CAN be a comedy writer after all!!!

Rob Klein 

 

---------------------------------------------
This message was sent using the LA Free-Net - LA's best kept secret.
http://www.lafn.org/