Valuable Duck-book found in margarine crate

[Olaf Solstrand]

Quoting Daniel van Eijmeren <dve at kabelfoon.nl>:
> > If anyone is wrong here, it's Timo, not the journalist.
> 
> I disagree. I certainly don't want to hear that Timo is "wrong". 
> In this context, "wrong" is a very bad word to use.

Oops - naturally, you're right. I was just trying to point out that what 
Sigvald claimed to be "wrong" here, was correct in the article. So... my tongue 
slipped, and I said something I shouldn't have said.

Sorry, Timo. Sorry, everybody. If you accept my excuse, that is (I realize that 
accepting excuses can be pretty tough on the DCML right now).



Oh, and, Sigvald:
> No she (it's a female journalist we're talking about here) is *NOT* correct. 
> My encyclopaedia says that the definition of a book is "printed material 
> that are tied together to a whole consisting of *at least* 49 pages". The 
> first issue of DD&Co is 20 pages, in the 1950s they were 36 pages – still 
> far away from being classified as a book. 

That is *book*. We're talking about *comic books*. The definition of a comic 
book, according to Encarta, is "a magazine that consists almost entirely of 
stories told in a series of colored panels in which balloons over the 
characters’ heads provide dialogue and the thoughts of the characters".



Olaf