this stuff we're discussing

[SRoweCanoe@aol.com]

In a message dated 4/3/2004 10:00:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
kingofduckburg at apptechnc.net writes:
>Staying in one brief
>time period for eternity is stagnation.

didnt seem to have hurt sherlock holmes too much.....
  or historical romances at all!!

but if everybody set up duck stories in the 1940s-1950s it might be
(sorta like Briging Up Father still wearing spats in the 1990s).
   but frankly, i think if we didnt know the Rosa stories were set in the 
1950s, would we know?  I personaly (although willing to be corrected) havent 
noticed any 1950s anachronisms in them.   would a strict rule against 50s stories 
mean no Barks reprints?

a couple weeks ago, i emailed Gemstone complaining about those sword and 
sorcery fantasy Mickey Mouse stories.  I dislike them intensely - and I dont read 
them.  I do force myself to read the HD&L "lesson of the day" soccer stories 
though.   
  If anyone tries to tell me that those Mickey Stories are cannon, I will 
just smile  at you, and re-read those old Fallberg-Murray stories.   

steven rowe