Disney-comics digest #371.

[Mikko Aittola]

Don wrote:
> 	Unless I misunderstand you, you're saying that you don't see why
> I should be upset by the contents of a "private" FAX and not upset by
> the contents of an article in a major magazine? 

Well, you sort of misunderstand me and sort of not...
First, of course I see the difference between the famous FAX and
the story in the magazine. I totally agree that you should sue Grandey
because he accused you about crimes you didn't do.
But both the FAX and the story in the magazine contained also 
false information about Lo$. I don't PERSONALLY care if Grandey 
tells lies about Lo$ in FAXes but when he tolds the lies to press
I think the false information should be corrected. You see here in
Finland about nobody knows how you wrote Lo$ and how 'painfully
accurate' it is to Barks' work. Well, that was before Grandey told us. 
It's not that big deal, but I'm still going to send a letter to the 
writer of the article.

I'm little late, but HAPPY BIRTHDAY!



Aku Ankka 25&26/94:

25/94
  WDC 125  Barks' winter story
  H 8460   
  OS 238 D  Barks' one-pager
  conclusion chapter of U$ 31
  OS 408 D  Barks' one-pager


26/94
  D 92200
  H 9043  two-page Goofy story
  WDC 36  by Barks
  D 93481 First part of viking adventure by Marco Rota


Are the contents same everywhere in northern Europe?  


     /Mikko