Marco Polo and mounds
Bjorn-Are.Davidsen@s.prosjekt98.telenor.no
Bjorn-Are.Davidsen at s.prosjekt98.telenor.no
Thu Oct 26 08:58:56 CET 1995
I sent this yesterday, however, it seemed to have got hooked down in the net, no doubt
due to finding a nice tavern
Re: Marco Polo
Daniel wrote that
> According to the British librarian Frances Wood, Marco Polo has
> never been in China. He *made up* his stories about his time there.
There's been a certain number of Englishmen who have discovered
new truths about old truths lately. The Holy Grail, Robin Hood's grave
and Arthur's Camelot has been discovered by Graham Philips (with
co-author Martin Keatman) the last few years, most of these a short
drive from Philips' home in Coventry.
Regarding MP the story seems to be that he found in stead a nice
tavern in Constantinople (Queen of cities, Centre of the Roman
Empire) and spent all his time listening to real travellers' stories in that
cosmopolitan centre and end station of the Silk Road. So his own
"travels" are really based on facts, however, second hand. So the
new story goes.
I guess someone will come up with some counterfacts, however much
I enjoy the vision of Constantinople being the cradle of Polo's writings.
Both The Holy Grail, Robin Hood and Arthur have provided an
unceasingly flood of stories, and I look forward to read Don's on
Arthur.
So when will $crooge also discover the Grail and Robin Hood,
perhaps put into one story and connected?
Re: MOUNDS
Thanks, Todd, for providing sources for Pre-Colombian stone
artifacts. I'll try to find the books, especially Trento's and see how they
fit the Norwegian material I mentioned (Prytz). However, I think I'll
remain somewhat sceptical until more "facts" are found, based on
previous experince with Daniken and his likes.
My sceptisism is not reduced by hearing you tell of
> one of the larger sites that is open to the public as a tourist attraction
>in New Hampshire. I visited it in the late 1970's. Unfortunately, it has
> been messed around with a lot since it's discovery by
> previous owners, so the true origins can only be guessed at
Why and how could anyone do a thing like that to "true evidence" for
Europeans in the New World before Columbus? Perhaps because
the owners really didn't believe it to be so true after all?
BTW, Todd, thanks for your great job on lettering Sandman! If you
meet Neil G., please tell him that I found his use of G.K. Chesterton in
the series one of the true wonders of the modern world! Of course I'm
deeply sorry that Neil did put an end to using GKC near the conclusion
of the series (or what seems to be the conclusion, so far).
Hopefully he will pop up (or something) in a later and different series!
Beg, persuade, threaten, cry - just make sure Neil keep up his artistic
use of perhaps the greatest, the most original, exciting, paradoxical
and democratic thinker this century!
Anyone interested in getting great ideas for stories shuld read GKC!
Bjorn-Are
bjorn-are.davidsen at s.prosjekt98.telenor.no
*******************************************************************************
- The Weaver in the Web that he made -
*******************************************************************************
More information about the DCML
mailing list