Donaldists

[Sigvald Grøsfjeld jr.]

"Fluks, H.W." <H.W.Fluks at kpn.com> skrev:

>> Well people still distinguish between serious
>> politicians, scientists, historians, etc. and
>> other people without insulting anyone.
> 
> But your distinction is different. Saying "Most
> serious Donaldists only consider Barks (and Rosa)"
> is at the same level as "Most serious literature
> analysts do not consider comics".

You're right. It often seems that literature have to
be a bit boring to be considered by "serious"
literature analysts. Why do you think Astrid Lindgren
never got a Nobel Literature Price? It was beacause
she wrote for children. Anyway even "experts" doesn't
have monopoly on the truth so you don't need to agree
with them to be seen as serious.


> If you want to define a term like "serious
> Donaldist", I want to be called a serious
> Donaldist.

Of course you are, you're the man behind the great
Bolderbast pages!


>> In the cover of the last DD&Co (19/2000)
> 
> Did they stop 2 years ago? 8-)

Oh sorry! I meant 2002...


>>> But please don't tell other people that
>>> that's the *only* "serious" (?) way to go.
>>
>> And I didn't do that...
> 
> Technically, no. But writing "most serious
> Donaldists do X" strongly suggests "anyone
> not doing X is not a serious Donaldist".
> 
> My only point is that there's more in Disney
> comics than just Barks and Rosa.

I have no problems with that. I've got all 256 Donald
Duck Pockets published in Norway so far, and that's
Italian stuff, off various quality.

Best regards from
Sigvald :-)

______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Dokumentmappe
Tilgang til dine viktigste filer uansett hvor du er!
http://no.briefcase.yahoo.com/