Comments to ROB

[Olaf Solstrand]

> If not, you do IMO put to much faith in one single IMO obscure source.
There
> are a lot of other sources showing Donald taking a bath or showering with
a
> naked over-body without there being any sign of any wings at all.

What makes one source more obscure than another? His wings COULD be hidden,
just like his ears or his genitalia?


> Besides we have *not* seen the whole story where the actual panel is
found.

Correction - YOU have *not* seen the whole story where the actual panel is
found. I assume Søren has, and also got the feeling that Rob knows this
story.


> My guess is that there is another, much more logical reason (like a
> Gearloose-invention) that is supposed to make Donald being able to fly
just
> like that.

...my guess would be that the original poster on this matter, Søren, HAS
read the story and knows whether such a thingie is involved or not, and
wouldn't post it if it was.

Oh well. Søren, enlighten us.


Olaf