Regarding "Stonewall Duck"
Sigvald Grøsfjeld jr.
sigvald4 at yahoo.no
Sun Sep 22 09:33:20 CEST 2002
lgiver at postoffice.pacbell.net wrote:
> 100 years before the story in WDC&S 239 (1960):
> Using the name "Stonewall" Barks must have had
> the American civil war in mind, 1861-64,
You miss the last year by one year. That war ended in
1865.
> with "Stonewall Jackson" a famous general
> for the South. However, since Don Rosa has
> determined that Duckburg is on the Pacific
> coast, near the actual town of Eureka,
> California, Duckburg could not have been
> involved in the American Civil war.
Wrong again, take a look at a map for that war.
California and Oregon was on the North's side so I
guess they sent troops to the Ballefields in the east.
However Don Rosa has once told me (when I was doing my
WEB-pages about the history of Duckburg) that Calisota
was neutral in that war.
> Perhaps we could determine what foreign power...
Forreign power? Why not indians?
I guess that Stonewall Duck must have been the leader
of the Woodchuck Militia in 1860.
Sigvald :-)
______________________________________________________
Se den nye Yahoo! Mail på http://no.yahoo.com/
Nytt design, enklere å bruke, alltid tilgang til Adressebok, Kalender og Notisbok
More information about the DCML
mailing list